Help Guide
Bookmark
Live Chat
Click
Here
To
Login
Stay Connected
Widgets | Desktop IM | RSS
Welcome Guest Login or Signup
 
 

   NEWS

Top News:
Overall
World
US News
Environment
Business
Science & Technology
Green Building
Green Lifestyle
Health
Culture & Arts
Movie Reviews
Editorial
Odds & Ends
Upcoming News:
World
US News
Environment
Business
Science & Technology
Green Building
Green Lifestyle
Health
Culture & Arts
Movie Reviews
Editorial
Odds & Ends
Hall of Fame:
Top Writers
Top Articles
Archives
My Information:
My articles
Submit News
Total votes given: (log in)
Total articles written: (log in)
Total votes received: (log in)

- Posted by Kate1983 on June 5, 2007, 4:53 pm || Total Votes: 0
George Monbiot resists the urge to do battle in a fog of meaningless statistics. Now that the dismissal of climate change is no longer fashionable, the professional deniers are trying another means of stopping us from taking action. It would be cheaper, they say, to wait for the impacts of climate change and then adapt to them. They have the figures to prove it. It is tempting to prove them wrong. Given the new projections of major drought in continental interiors, of a possible global food deficit, of sea level rises with the potential to affect billions of people, it should be easy to demonstrate that the price of waiting for the catastrophe is higher than the price of reducing emissions. But it a temptation we should resist. Such calculations use costs which simply cannot be compared. The most famous exponent of far greater resources
Vote Up | Vote Down | Topic: World
Leave a Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.



*** GreenBin.com ***